Source: Park 2008

Park, Jungnok. "A New Attribution of the Authorship of T5 and T6 Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 31, no. 1-2 (2008[2010]): 339-367.

Assertions

Assertion Argument Place in source Search

Park argues that both T5 and T6 are "by Zhi Qian or by one of his successors from his translation circle". Based upon archaic writing style, T5 is probably Zhi Qian's work and may be one of his earliest translations. T5 appears "earlier than T210", which Park dates around 224. T6 is probably not by Zhi Qian himself, "but a successor who produced the work possibly around 280".

Edit

Passim

 Park argues that both T5 and T6 are "by Zhi Qian or by one of his successors from his translation circle". Based upon archaic writing style, T5 is probably Zhi Qian's work and may be one of his earliest translations. T5 appears "earlier than T210", which Park dates around 224. T6 is probably not by Zhi Qian himself, "but a successor who produced the work possibly around 280". T0006; 般泥洹經

Park argues that both T5 and T6 are "by Zhi Qian or by one of his successors from his translation circle". Based upon archaic writing style, T5 is probably Zhi Qian's work and may be one of his earliest translations. T5 appears "earlier than T210", which Park dates around 224. T6 is probably not by Zhi Qian himself, "but a successor who produced the work possibly around 280".

Edit

Passim.

 Park argues that both T5 and T6 are "by Zhi Qian or by one of his successors from his translation circle". Based upon archaic writing style, T5 is probably Zhi Qian's work and may be one of his earliest translations. T5 appears "earlier than T210", which Park dates around 224. T6 is probably not by Zhi Qian himself, "but a successor who produced the work possibly around 280". T0005; 佛般泥洹經