Source: Ono 1937/2000

Ono Genmyō 小野玄妙. Bussho kaisetsu daijiten. Bekkan: Bukkyō kyōten sōron 仏書解説大辞典　別巻仏教経典総論. Tokyo: Daitō shuppan, 1937/2000.

Assertions

Assertion	Argument	Place in source	Search
Texts: T0023; 大樓炭經 People: Anonymous (China), 失譯, 闕譯, 未詳撰者, 未詳作者, 不載譯人 (translator 譯)	Ono expresses doubts about the ascription of the *Lokasthāna T23 to Faju. He points out that the ascription was added by Sengyou, who explicitly states that it was missing in Dao'an's catalogue; and that elsewhere, Sengyou also ascribes a very similar title to Dharmarakṣa. Ono feels it is unlikely that two versions of the text existed from these close collaborators, and that it is best to trust Dao'an, as the earlier witness, and infer that Faju acted as bishou (and perhaps effected more thorough revisions). Edit	57	Ono expresses doubts about the ascription of the *Lokasthana T23 to Faju. He points out that the ascription was added by Sengyou, who explicitly states that it was missing in Dao'an's catalogue; and that elsewhere, Sengyou also ascribes a very similar title to Dharmaraksa. Ono feels it is unlikely that two versions of the text existed from these close collaborators, and that it is best to trust Dao'an, as the earlier witness, and infer that Faju acted as bishou (and perhaps effected more thorough revisions). Anonymous (China), 失譯, 闕譯, 未詳撰者, 未詳作者, 不載譯人 T0023; 大樓炭經

Assertion

Argument

Place in source

Texts: T0023; 大樓炭經
People: Anonymous (China), 失譯, 闕譯, 未詳撰者, 未詳作者, 不載譯人 (translator 譯)

Ono expresses doubts about the ascription of the *Lokasthāna T23 to Faju. He points out that the ascription was added by Sengyou, who explicitly states that it was missing in Dao'an's catalogue; and that elsewhere, Sengyou also ascribes a very similar title to Dharmarakṣa. Ono feels it is unlikely that two versions of the text existed from these close collaborators, and that it is best to trust Dao'an, as the earlier witness, and infer that Faju acted as bishou (and perhaps effected more thorough revisions).

Edit