Source: Kanno 1994

Kanno Hiroshi 菅野博史. “An Overview of Research on Chinese Commentaries of the Lotus Sūtra.” Acta Asiatica 66 (1994): 87–103.

https://www.thezensite.com/ZenTeachings/Translations/Overview_Research_LotusSutra.pdf

Assertions

Assertion	Argument	Place in source	Search
Texts: T1716; 妙法蓮華經玄義 ; T1718; 妙法蓮華經文句 People: Guanding, 灌頂 (compiler 編集)	Two commentaries on the Lotus Sūtra are ascribed to Zhiyi: Fahua xianyi 法華經玄義 (妙法蓮華經玄義) T1716, and the Fahua wenju 法華文句 (妙法蓮華經文句) T1718. Kanno states that neither of these works is in fact by Zhiyi. They are, rather, Guanding's 灌頂 (561–632) edited notes based on lectures given by Zhiyi on the text. Edit		Two commentaries on the Lotus Sutra are ascribed to Zhiyi: Fahua xianyi 法華經玄義 (妙法蓮華經玄義) T1716, and the Fahua wenju 法華文句 (妙法蓮華經文句) T1718. Kanno states that neither of these works is in fact by Zhiyi. They are, rather, Guanding's 灌頂 (561–632) edited notes based on lectures given by Zhiyi on the text. Guanding, 灌頂 T1716; 妙法蓮華經玄義 T1718; 妙法蓮華經文句

Assertion

Argument

Place in source

Texts: T1716; 妙法蓮華經玄義 ; T1718; 妙法蓮華經文句
People: Guanding, 灌頂 (compiler 編集)

Two commentaries on the Lotus Sūtra are ascribed to Zhiyi: Fahua xianyi 法華經玄義 (妙法蓮華經玄義) T1716, and the Fahua wenju 法華文句 (妙法蓮華經文句) T1718. Kanno states that neither of these works is in fact by Zhiyi. They are, rather, Guanding's 灌頂 (561–632) edited notes based on lectures given by Zhiyi on the text.

Edit