Source: Ha 2001

Ha Jeong-yong 河廷龍. Samguk Yusa je jomok gan gwangye go "『三國遺事』 諸條目間 關係考". Hanguk sahaksa hakbo 韓國史學史學報 4 (2001): 5–37.

https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART000951450

Assertions

Assertion Argument Place in source Search

The Samguk yusa 三國遺事 T2039 is a collection of traditions about the three kingdoms of Korea (Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla) as well as biographies of Korean monks, history of Korean Buddhism, legends, and folktales. Traditionally the text is attributed to the Goryeo monk Iryeon 一然 (1206–1289), following the attribution in the fifth and last fascicle (T2039.1010b05). However, some scholars have doubted whether Iryeon was responsible for the entire text. Ha Jeong-yong 河廷龍 is one of these scholars. He writes that he has pointed out issues in the organization of the text, and I have suggested the possibility that these inconsistencies arise because the T2039 is not the work of Iryeon 一然 alone, but was edited after Iryeon’s death by his disciples and later third parties. That is to say, he entertains the hypothesis that the text was produced by multiple authors from different time periods. Ha's arguments are fleshed out further in the monograph

Ha Jeong-yong 河廷龍. Samguk yusa saryo bipan 삼국유사 사료비판 三國遺事史料批判. Minjoksa 民族社, 2005.

Edit

 The Samguk yusa 三國遺事 T2039 is a collection of traditions about the three kingdoms of Korea (Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla) as well as biographies of Korean monks, history of Korean Buddhism, legends, and folktales. Traditionally the text is attributed to the Goryeo monk Iryeon 一然 (1206–1289), following the attribution in the fifth and last fascicle (T2039.1010b05). However, some scholars have doubted whether Iryeon was responsible for the entire text. Ha Jeong-yong 河廷龍 is one of these scholars. He writes that he has pointed out issues in the organization of the text, and I have suggested the possibility that these inconsistencies arise because the T2039 is not the work of Iryeon 一然 alone, but was edited after Iryeon’s death by his disciples and later third parties. That is to say, he entertains the hypothesis that the text was produced by multiple authors from different time periods. Ha's arguments are fleshed out further in the monograph Ha Jeong-yong 河廷龍. Samguk yusa saryo bipan 삼국유사 사료비판 三國遺事史料批判. Minjoksa 民族社, 2005. T2039; 三國遺事