Text: Shanxing nü jing 善信女經; Xinshan jing 信善經

Summary

Identifier	[None]
Title	Xinshan jing 信善經; Shanxing nü jing 善信女經 [Hayashiya 1941]
Date	[None]

Assertions

Preferred?	Source	Pertains to	Argument	Details
No	[Hayashiya 1941] Hayashiya Tomojirō 林屋友次郎. Kyōroku kenkyū 経録研究. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1941. — 422-423	Shanxing nü jing 善信女經; Xinshan jing 信善經	LDSBJ (Fei Changfang) says that Xinshan jing 信善經, i.e. the Shanxin nü jing 善信女經, was translated by Dharmakṣema 曇無識, but Hayashiya points out that Dao'an already classified the Shanxing nü jing 善信女經 as a dubious scripture 疑經, and KYL 開元録 also included it in the category of dubious scriptures 疑經. [MR: note that the mention by Dao'an would make it chronologically impossible that this text was a Dharmakṣema translation.] Entry author: Atsushi Iseki Edit	Title: Xinshan jing 信善經; Shanxing nü jing 善信女經

Preferred?

Source

Pertains to

Argument

Details

[Hayashiya 1941] Hayashiya Tomojirō 林屋友次郎. Kyōroku kenkyū 経録研究. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1941. — 422-423

Shanxing nü jing 善信女經; Xinshan jing 信善經

LDSBJ (Fei Changfang) says that Xinshan jing 信善經, i.e. the Shanxin nü jing 善信女經, was translated by *Dharmakṣema 曇無識, but Hayashiya points out that Dao'an already classified the Shanxing nü jing 善信女經 as a dubious scripture 疑經, and KYL 開元録 also included it in the category of dubious scriptures 疑經. [MR: note that the mention by Dao'an would make it chronologically impossible that this text was a *Dharmakṣema translation.]

Entry author: Atsushi Iseki

Edit

Title: Xinshan jing 信善經; Shanxing nü jing 善信女經