Source: Yamabe 2010

Yamabe, Nobuyoshi. "Two Meditation Manuals in Conjunction with Pozdneyev's Mongolian Manual." In From Turfan to Ajanta: Festschrift for Dieter Schlingloff on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday," edited by Eli Franco and Monika Zin, 2:1046-1057. Bairahawa, Rupandehi: Lumbini International Research Institute, 2010.

Assertions

Assertion	Argument	Place in source	Search
Texts: Diyan-u δoul udqa kiged, bisil-δalqu-yin jang üile-zi üneger üjügülügci kemegdekü oruisibai; "Herein is [a text] which correctly teaches the ritual of meditation..and the quintessence of dhyana" ; T0619; 五門禪經要用法	Yamabe notes that the Mongolian manual of dhyāna and samādhi described by Pozdneyev in 1887 contains content corresponding closely to T619. On this basis, he argues that "there cannot be any doubt there is a close relationship between these two texts". Yamabe refers for his knowledge of the Mongolian materials to Pozdneyev, Aleksei M. Dhyāna and Samādhi im Mongolischen Lamaismus, translated by W. A. Unkrig. Hannover: Heiny Lafaire, 1927. Religion and Ritual in Society: Lamaist Buddhism in Late 19th-Century Mongolia, translated by Alo Raun and Linda Raun. Bloomington: The Mongolia Society, 1978. See also Yamabe 2010. [Acknowledgement: I am grateful to Chen Ruixuan for bringing this section of Yamabe's study to my attention --- MR.] Edit	71, 95-98	Yamabe notes that the Mongolian manual of dhyana and samadhi described by Pozdneyev in 1887 contains content corresponding closely to T619. On this basis, he argues that "there cannot be any doubt there is a close relationship between these two texts". Yamabe refers for his knowledge of the Mongolian materials to Pozdneyev, Aleksei M. Dhyana and Samadhi im Mongolischen Lamaismus, translated by W. A. Unkrig. Hannover: Heiny Lafaire, 1927. Religion and Ritual in Society: Lamaist Buddhism in Late 19th-Century Mongolia, translated by Alo Raun and Linda Raun. Bloomington: The Mongolia Society, 1978. See also Yamabe 2010. [Acknowledgement: I am grateful to Chen Ruixuan for bringing this section of Yamabe's study to my attention --- MR.] Diyan-u δoul udqa kiged, bisil-δalqu-yin jang uile-zi uneger ujugulugci kemegdeku oruisibai; "Herein is [a text] which correctly teaches the ritual of meditation..and the quintessence of dhyana" T0619; 五門禪經要用法

Assertion

Argument

Place in source

Texts: Diyan-u δoul udqa kiged, bisil-δalqu-yin jang üile-zi üneger üjügülügci kemegdekü oruisibai; "Herein is [a text] which correctly teaches the ritual of meditation..and the quintessence of dhyana" ; T0619; 五門禪經要用法

Yamabe notes that the Mongolian manual of dhyāna and samādhi described by Pozdneyev in 1887 contains content corresponding closely to T619. On this basis, he argues that "there cannot be any doubt there is a close relationship between these two texts".

Yamabe refers for his knowledge of the Mongolian materials to Pozdneyev, Aleksei M. Dhyāna and Samādhi im Mongolischen Lamaismus, translated by W. A. Unkrig. Hannover: Heiny Lafaire, 1927. Religion and Ritual in Society: Lamaist Buddhism in Late 19th-Century Mongolia, translated by Alo Raun and Linda Raun. Bloomington: The Mongolia Society, 1978.