Text: T0279; 大方廣佛華嚴經

Summary

Identifier	T0279 [T]
Title	大方廣佛華嚴經 [T]
Date	[None]
Translator 譯	Śikṣānanda, 實叉難陀 [T]

There may be translations for this text listed in the Bibliography of Translations from the Chinese Buddhist Canon into Western Languages. If translations are listed, this link will take you directly to them. However, if no translations are listed, the link will lead only to the head of the page.

There are resources for the study of this text in the SAT Daizōkyō Text Dabatase (Saṃgaṇikīkṛtaṃ Taiśotripiṭakaṃ).

Assertions

Preferred?	Source	Pertains to	Argument	Details
No	[T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014.	T0279; 大方廣佛華嚴經	Entry author: Michael Radich Edit	Title: 大方廣佛華嚴經 People: Śikṣānanda, 實叉難陀 (translator 譯) Identifier: T0279
No	[Silk 2013] Silk, Jonathan A. “Review Article: Buddhist Sūtras in Sanskrit from the Potala.” IIJ 56 (2013): 61-87. — 64	T0278; 大方廣佛華嚴經 T0279; 大方廣佛華嚴經	"As [Vinitā Bhikṣuṇī] points out...the colophon of the 17th text, Anantabuyyddhakṣetraguṇodbhāvanā, prov[es] that the Buddhāvataṃsaka Vaipulyapiṭaka existed as a collection already in the Indian subcontinent, and thus is not an East Asian innovation.” Entry author: Michael Radich Edit

Preferred?

Source

Pertains to

Argument

Details

[T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014.

T0279; 大方廣佛華嚴經

Entry author: Michael Radich

Edit

Title: 大方廣佛華嚴經
People: Śikṣānanda, 實叉難陀 (translator 譯)
Identifier: T0279

[Silk 2013] Silk, Jonathan A. “Review Article: Buddhist Sūtras in Sanskrit from the Potala.” IIJ 56 (2013): 61-87. — 64

"As [Vinitā Bhikṣuṇī] points out...the colophon of the 17th text, Anantabuyyddhakṣetraguṇodbhāvanā, prov[es] that the Buddhāvataṃsaka Vaipulyapiṭaka existed as a collection already in the Indian subcontinent, and thus is not an East Asian innovation.”

Entry author: Michael Radich

Edit