Text: Fashen jing 法身經, *Dharmakāya-sūtra?

Summary

Identifier	[None]
Title	Fashen jing 法身經, *Dharmakāya-sūtra? [Wagner 1969]
Date	[None]

Assertions

Preferred?	Source	Pertains to	Argument	Details
No	[Wagner 1969] Wagner, Rudolf G. “Die Fragen Hui-yuans an Kumārajīva.“ PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 1969. — 82, 177, 179	Fashen jing 法身經, *Dharmakāya-sūtra?	Wagner notes that in his side of the exchange of letters with preserved in the Dasheng dayi zhang 大乘大義章 T1856 (XLV) 130c27-28, Lushan Huiyuan 廬山慧遠 mentions [appears to mention? --- MR] a Dharmakāya-sūtra 法身經. He cites Liebenthal, who speculated that this title corresponded to the 寶積三昧文殊師利菩薩問法身經 T356 ascribed to An Shigao 安世高, which is paralleled by a second translation ascribed to Jñānagupta/Jinagupta, 入法界體性經 T355. [Note that Nattier 2008 does not consider T356 a genuine An Shigao work, and in fact, gives it as the example of her silent method of dealing with inauthentic works, p. 29 and n. 60 --- MR.] Entry author: Michael Radich Edit	Title: Fashen jing 法身經, *Dharmakāya-sūtra?

Preferred?

Source

Pertains to

Argument

Details

[Wagner 1969] Wagner, Rudolf G. “Die Fragen Hui-yuans an Kumārajīva.“ PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 1969. — 82, 177, 179

Fashen jing 法身經, *Dharmakāya-sūtra?

Wagner notes that in his side of the exchange of letters with preserved in the Dasheng dayi zhang 大乘大義章
T1856 (XLV) 130c27-28, Lushan Huiyuan 廬山慧遠 mentions [appears to mention? --- MR] a *Dharmakāya-sūtra 法身經. He cites Liebenthal, who speculated that this title corresponded to the 寶積三昧文殊師利菩薩問法身經 T356 ascribed to An Shigao 安世高, which is paralleled by a second translation ascribed to *Jñānagupta/Jinagupta, 入法界體性經 T355.

[Note that Nattier 2008 does not consider T356 a genuine An Shigao work, and in fact, gives it as the example of her silent method of dealing with inauthentic works, p. 29 and n. 60 --- MR.]

Entry author: Michael Radich

Edit

Title: Fashen jing 法身經, *Dharmakāya-sūtra?