Text: T101(9); (untitled)

Summary

Identifier	T101(9) [T]
Title	(untitled) [T]
Date	[None]

There may be translations for this text listed in the Bibliography of Translations from the Chinese Buddhist Canon into Western Languages. If translations are listed, this link will take you directly to them. However, if no translations are listed, the link will lead only to the head of the page.

There are resources for the study of this text in the SAT Daizōkyō Text Dabatase (Saṃgaṇikīkṛtaṃ Taiśotripiṭakaṃ).

Assertions

Preferred?	Source	Pertains to	Argument	Details
No	[T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014. — T101 (II) 495b7-c23	T101(9); (untitled)	Entry author: Michael Radich Edit	Title: (untitled) Identifier: T101(9)
No	[Harrison 2002] Harrison, Paul. “Another Addition to the An Shigao Corpus? Preliminary Notes on an Early Chinese Saṃyuktāgama Translation.” In Early Buddhism and Abhidharma Thought: In Honor of Doctor Hajime Sakurabe on His Seventy-seventh Birthday, 1-32. Kyoto: Heirakuji shoten, 2002. — 2-4, 10	T101(9); (untitled)	According to Harrison, T101(9) (untitled) is not by An Shigao, even if the rest of T101 may well be. Sengyou, in CSZJJ, lists among "ancient variant translations" 25 works with titles that Shiio (1937) noticed match texts in T101. However, nos. 9 and 10 are missing from this list. T612 is "the same translation" as T101(9), but is ascribed to Dharmarakṣa in the present Taisho. Harrison suggests that T101(9), along with T101(10), might be more likely to be by Dharmarakṣa than An Shigao. However, he also says that T612 "prosodically ... seems rather irregular for Dharmarakṣa, and in many respects the style and diction are not out of line with other works by An Shigao. He also notes that T612 is not ascribed to Dharmarakṣa by Sengyou. See also Nattier (2008) for a summary of relevant scholarship. Nattier merely says that the "style (of this text) appears to be of a different vintage" (66). Entry author: Michael Radich Edit

Preferred?

Source

Pertains to

Argument

Details

[T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014. — T101 (II) 495b7-c23

T101(9); (untitled)

Entry author: Michael Radich

Edit

Title: (untitled)
Identifier: T101(9)

[Harrison 2002] Harrison, Paul. “Another Addition to the An Shigao Corpus? Preliminary Notes on an Early Chinese Saṃyuktāgama Translation.” In Early Buddhism and Abhidharma Thought: In Honor of Doctor Hajime Sakurabe on His Seventy-seventh Birthday, 1-32. Kyoto: Heirakuji shoten, 2002. — 2-4, 10

T101(9); (untitled)

According to Harrison, T101(9) (untitled) is not by An Shigao, even if the rest of T101 may well be. Sengyou, in CSZJJ, lists among "ancient variant translations" 25 works with titles that Shiio (1937) noticed match texts in T101. However, nos. 9 and 10 are missing from this list. T612 is "the same translation" as T101(9), but is ascribed to Dharmarakṣa in the present Taisho. Harrison suggests that T101(9), along with T101(10), might be more likely to be by Dharmarakṣa than An Shigao. However, he also says that T612 "prosodically ... seems rather irregular for Dharmarakṣa, and in many respects the style and diction are not out of line with other works by An Shigao. He also notes that T612 is not ascribed to Dharmarakṣa by Sengyou.

See also Nattier (2008) for a summary of relevant scholarship. Nattier merely says that the "style (of this text) appears to be of a different vintage" (66).

Entry author: Michael Radich

Edit