Text: T1843; 大乘起信論義疏

Summary

Identifier T1843 [T]
Title 大乘起信論義疏 [T]
Date not later than 7c [Young 2015]
Author Huiyuan, 慧遠, Jingying Huiyuan, 淨影慧遠 [T]
Author Anonymous (China), 失譯, 闕譯, 未詳撰者, 未詳作者, 不載譯人 [Young 2015]

There may be translations for this text listed in the Bibliography of Translations from the Chinese Buddhist Canon into Western Languages. If translations are listed, this link will take you directly to them. However, if no translations are listed, the link will lead only to the head of the page.

There are resources for the study of this text in the SAT Daizōkyō Text Dabatase (Saṃgaṇikīkṛtaṃ Taiśotripiṭakaṃ).

Assertions

Preferred? Source Pertains to Argument Details

No

[T]  T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014.

淨影寺沙門慧遠撰

Entry author: Michael Radich

Edit

Yes

[Sharf DDB]  Sharf, Robert. DDB s.v. 寶藏論 — Accessed April 2014

"the Baozang lun is stylistically and doctrinally similar to a number of texts associated with the Ox-head 牛頭 Chan lineage, notably the Jueguan lun, Xinxin ming 信心銘, Xin ming, Wuxin lun, and so on. It also appears to be related to a group of seventh- and eighth-century Daoist commentaries and scriptures later classified under the heading chongxuan ("double mystery"). Like the Ox-head and chongxuan materials, the Baozang lun is a synthesis of Daoist 老莊 metaphysics and Buddhist Madhyamika 中觀派 dialectic. It is notable for its ruminations on concepts such as "true one" (zhen'i 眞一), "point of origin" (benji ), no-mind (wuxin 無心) etc. and is the locus classicus for the pairing of "transcendence" and "subtlety" (li 離 and wei 微). It also contains a critique of Buddha invocation practices (nianfo 念佛), and a positive reference to the doctrine that even insentient things have buddha-nature 佛性." Cf. Sharf (2002).

Entry author: Michael Radich

Edit

No

[Young 2015]  Young, Stuart. Conceiving the Indian Buddhist Patriarchs in China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2015. — 121 n. 25

Young notes briefly that Lai (1975, 193) considered the attribution of the Dasheng qi xin lun yishu 大乘起信論義疏 T1843 to Jingying Huiyuan 淨影慧遠 to be spurious. Young argues that T1843, attributed to Huiyuan 慧遠 and composed by Fazang 法藏, should be no later than the seventh century.

Entry author: Chia-wei Lin

Edit