| Identifier | T1698 [T] |
| Title | 金剛般若經疏 [T] |
| Date | after 623? [Hirai 1985] |
| Author | Zhiyi, 智顗, 天台智者 [T] |
| Compiler 編集 | Anonymous (China), 失譯, 闕譯, 未詳撰者, 未詳作者, 不載譯人 [Hirai 1985] |
There may be translations for this text listed in the Bibliography of Translations from the Chinese Buddhist Canon into Western Languages. If translations are listed, this link will take you directly to them. However, if no translations are listed, the link will lead only to the head of the page.
There are resources for the study of this text in the SAT Daizōkyō Text Dabatase (Saṃgaṇikīkṛtaṃ Taiśotripiṭakaṃ).
| Preferred? | Source | Pertains to | Argument | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No |
[T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014. |
隋天台智者大師說 Entry author: Michael Radich |
|
|
|
No |
[Hirai 1985] Hirai Shunʼei 平井俊榮. Hokke mongu no seiritsu ni kansuru kenkyū 法華文句の成立に関する研究. Tokyo: Shunjūsha 春秋社, 1985. |
Satō argues that the Jingang banre jing shu 金剛般若經疏 T1698, ascribed to Zhiyi, was not actually composed by Zhiyi. Comparison with the Jingang banre shu 金剛般若疏 T1699 by Jizang shows that the two works share a considerable number of parallel passages. Satō notes that the author of passages from T1698 is criticized by Jizang in T1699, who refers to him as “a certain person”. This might suggest that T1698 predates T1699 (but see further below). Satō maintains, moreover, that since Jizang's work matches in toto the sūtra subdivisions of T1698, we might think that Jizang took those divisions from T1698, and held the real author of T1698 in high regard (even if it is difficult to pinpoint the exact identity of that author). However, by carefully comparing the two texts, Hirai demonstrates that the author of T1698 plagiarized the “views of a certain person” cited in T1699. The author of T1698 cites these views as if they were his own. Further, Hirai argues that the author of T1698 based himself completely on T1699, modelling his own commentary on it. Thus, Hirai concludes that T1698 is not by Zhiyi, but rather, that the real author was probably a Tiantai adherent postdating Jizang's T1699. Entry author: Hyungrok Kim |
|
|
|
No |
[Ng 1993] Ng Yu-Kwan [吳汝鈞]. Tʼien-Tʼai Buddhism and Early Mādhyamika. Tendai Institute of Hawaii and the Buddhist Studies Program, University of Hawaii. 1993. — 9, 191 n. 27 |
Ng summarises views of ascription in the Zhiyi corpus, as propounded/summarised in turn by Tetsuei Satō 佐藤哲英. Tendai daishi no kenkyū 天台大師の研究. Hyakkaen 百華苑, 1961. According to this summary, the following works actually postdate Zhiyi, and include outright forgeries (Ng presents these works as examples of a larger class of such false ascriptions to Zhiyi). Jingang banre jing shu 金剛般若經疏 T1698 Entry author: Hyungrok Kim |
|