Text: T0272; 大薩遮尼乾子所說經

Summary

Identifier	T0272 [T]
Title	大薩遮尼乾子所說經 [T]
Date	[None]
Translator 譯	Bodhiruci, 菩提流支, 菩提留支 [T]

There may be translations for this text listed in the Bibliography of Translations from the Chinese Buddhist Canon into Western Languages. If translations are listed, this link will take you directly to them. However, if no translations are listed, the link will lead only to the head of the page.

There are resources for the study of this text in the SAT Daizōkyō Text Dabatase (Saṃgaṇikīkṛtaṃ Taiśotripiṭakaṃ).

Assertions

Preferred?	Source	Pertains to	Argument	Details
No	[T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014.	T0272; 大薩遮尼乾子所說經	Entry author: Michael Radich Edit	Title: 大薩遮尼乾子所說經 People: Bodhiruci, 菩提流支, 菩提留支 (translator 譯) Identifier: T0272
No	[Ono and Maruyama 1933-1936] Ono Genmyō 小野玄妙, Maruyama Takao 丸山孝雄, eds. Bussho kaisetsu daijiten 佛書解說大辭典. Tokyo: Daitō shuppan, 1933-1936 [縮刷版 1999]. — vol. 9, p. 396	T0271; 佛說菩薩行方便境界神通變化經 T0272; 大薩遮尼乾子所說經	Fuse Kōgaku 布施浩岳 points out that the 菩薩行方便境界神通變化經 T271 ascribed to Guṇabhadra 求那跋陀羅 and the 大薩遮尼乾子所説經 T272 ascribed to Bodhiruci 菩提留支 are alternate translations of the same text, but T271 should be the older, since it is about one third the length of T272. Entry author: Atsushi Iseki Edit
No	[Sakaino 1935] Sakaino Kōyō 境野黄洋. Shina Bukkyō seishi 支那佛教精史. Tokyo: Sakaino Kōyō Hakushi Ikō Kankōkai, 1935. — 670	T0272; 大薩遮尼乾子所說經 T0421; 奮迅王問經 T1357; 佛說師子奮迅菩薩所問經	Citing the Baochang catalogue 寶唱錄, KYL records that the title Pusa jingjie fenxun famen jing 菩薩境界奮迅法門經 [this is the form of the title in KYL (see below); Sakaino writes 菩薩境界奮迅法問經] attributed to Buddhaśānta is an alternate title for the Sazhe Niganzi jing 薩遮尼乾子經 [Sakaino writes 薩遮尼犍子經]. Sakaino claims that this report is another example of the confusions concerning Buddhaśānta and Bodhiruci. [NOTE: It is difficult to determine which text these assertions and records might refer to, and Sakaino’s possible confusion about the title above might reflect this problem. In T alone, we see the following extant texts with possibly related titles: 師子奮迅菩薩所問經 T1357 (anon.); 奮迅王問經 T421 (ascribed to *Gautama Prajñāruci); 大薩遮尼乾子所說經 T272 (ascribed to Bodhiruci), which contains such apparently related (and unique) phrase as (菩薩行方便)境界奮迅法門. Pending resolution of these problems, this note is associated with all three of these T titles. Cf. KYL T2154 [LV] 540c21-22, where Zhisheng gives a note to a title 大薩遮尼乾子所說經十卷, ascribed to Bodhiruci, reading: 或加受記無所說字或七卷或八卷一名菩薩境界奮迅法門經正光元年於洛陽為司州牧汝南王於第出第二譯與神通變化經同本 --- MR.] Entry author: Atsushi Iseki Edit

Preferred?

Source

Pertains to

Argument

Details

[T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014.

T0272; 大薩遮尼乾子所說經

Entry author: Michael Radich

Edit

Title: 大薩遮尼乾子所說經
People: Bodhiruci, 菩提流支, 菩提留支 (translator 譯)
Identifier: T0272

[Ono and Maruyama 1933-1936] Ono Genmyō 小野玄妙, Maruyama Takao 丸山孝雄, eds. Bussho kaisetsu daijiten 佛書解說大辭典. Tokyo: Daitō shuppan, 1933-1936 [縮刷版 1999]. — vol. 9, p. 396

Fuse Kōgaku 布施浩岳 points out that the 菩薩行方便境界神通變化經 T271 ascribed to Guṇabhadra 求那跋陀羅 and the 大薩遮尼乾子所説經 T272 ascribed to Bodhiruci 菩提留支 are alternate translations of the same text, but T271 should be the older, since it is about one third the length of T272.

Entry author: Atsushi Iseki

Edit

[Sakaino 1935] Sakaino Kōyō 境野黄洋. Shina Bukkyō seishi 支那佛教精史. Tokyo: Sakaino Kōyō Hakushi Ikō Kankōkai, 1935. — 670

Citing the Baochang catalogue 寶唱錄, KYL records that the title Pusa jingjie fenxun famen jing 菩薩境界奮迅法門經 [this is the form of the title in KYL (see below); Sakaino writes 菩薩境界奮迅法問經] attributed to *Buddhaśānta is an alternate title for the Sazhe Niganzi jing 薩遮尼乾子經 [Sakaino writes 薩遮尼犍子經]. Sakaino claims that this report is another example of the confusions concerning *Buddhaśānta and Bodhiruci.

[NOTE: It is difficult to determine which text these assertions and records might refer to, and Sakaino’s possible confusion about the title above might reflect this problem. In T alone, we see the following extant texts with possibly related titles:

師子奮迅菩薩所問經 T1357 (anon.);
奮迅王問經 T421 (ascribed to *Gautama Prajñāruci);
大薩遮尼乾子所說經 T272 (ascribed to Bodhiruci), which contains such apparently related (and unique) phrase as (菩薩行方便)境界奮迅法門.

Pending resolution of these problems, this note is associated with all three of these T titles.

Cf. KYL T2154 [LV] 540c21-22, where Zhisheng gives a note to a title 大薩遮尼乾子所說經十卷, ascribed to Bodhiruci, reading: 或加受記無所說字或七卷或八卷一名菩薩境界奮迅法門經正光元年於洛陽為司州牧汝南王於第出第二譯與神通變化經同本 --- MR.]

Entry author: Atsushi Iseki

Edit