Date: 383

Text Assertion Source
  • [T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014.
  • [T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014.
  • [T] T = CBETA [Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association]. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō 大正新脩大藏經. Edited by Takakusu Junjirō 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭. Tokyo: Taishō shinshū daizōkyō kankōkai/Daizō shuppan, 1924-1932. CBReader v 5.0, 2014.
  • [Palumbo 2013] Palumbo, Antonello. An Early Chinese Commentary on the Ekottarika-āgama: The Fenbie gongde lun 分別功德論 and the History of the Translation of the Zengyi ahan jing 增一阿含經. Dharma Drum Buddhist College Research Series 7. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Co., 2013.

    • 21 n. 28; 61-62
  • [Palumbo 2013] Palumbo, Antonello. An Early Chinese Commentary on the Ekottarika-āgama: The Fenbie gongde lun 分別功德論 and the History of the Translation of the Zengyi ahan jing 增一阿含經. Dharma Drum Buddhist College Research Series 7. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Co., 2013.

    • 32-33
Name Date Notes Search
*Saṃghabhadra?, *Saṃghabhūti? 僧伽跋澄, 僧伽䟦澄 fl. 381-399? Demiéville (1954): 364-365 discusses the forms of his name and the problem of its restitution into Skt. Demiéville suggests that this transcription may derive from a Prakrit, Saṅghabhaddaṃ, Saṅghabhaṭa etc. Variants in the glossary of Xuanying and Huilin (T2128) 隥伽跋澄, 橙伽跋澄, 撜伽跋澄. Demiéville also refers to Lévi, Journal Asiatique (1936): 1:89. Nattier (2010) on T309, 232 n. 4, discusses problems with the reconstruction of the name, and expresses dissatisfaction with all alternatives mooted to date; she also refers to a treatment of this problem by Demiéville in HBGR (1978) 281a. The Preface to T212 ascribed to Sengrui reports that he collaborated with Zhu Fonian on the translation of that text (Udānavarga) in 398-399. *Samghabhadra?, *Samghabhuti? 僧伽跋澄, 僧伽䟦澄 Demieville (1954): 364-365 discusses the forms of his name and the problem of its restitution into Skt. Demieville suggests that this transcription may derive from a Prakrit, Sanghabhaddam, Sanghabhata etc. Variants in the glossary of Xuanying and Huilin (T2128) 隥伽跋澄, 橙伽跋澄, 撜伽跋澄. Demieville also refers to Levi, Journal Asiatique (1936): 1:89. Nattier (2010) on T309, 232 n. 4, discusses problems with the reconstruction of the name, and expresses dissatisfaction with all alternatives mooted to date; she also refers to a treatment of this problem by Demieville in HBGR (1978) 281a. The Preface to T212 ascribed to Sengrui reports that he collaborated with Zhu Fonian on the translation of that text (Udanavarga) in 398-399.