Source: Fei 597

In LDSBJ, Fei Zhangfang refers 10 times simply to "Dao'an's catalogue" 道安錄, by which he presumably means the so-called Zongli zhongjing mulu.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX} 49d17-18, 52c1 etc.

Fei Zhangfang lists in LDSBJ a Mohe banre boluomi zhou jing 摩訶般若波羅蜜呪經 in one fascicle among the translations of Zhi Qian , with a note saying he has his information from Baochang's 寶唱 catalogue and giving the alternate title Banre boluomi zhou jing 般若波羅蜜呪經.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 58b9

Fei Changfang makes reference to this catalogue at various junctures, but includes the catalogue among a list of texts he never saw personally (in his fascicle 15):

竺道祖眾經錄四卷(魏世吳世晉世雜錄河西偽錄)
...
右二十四家錄檢傳記有目。並未嘗見故列之於後。使傳萬世.
T2034 [XLIX] 127c4, c17.

Edit

In LDSBJ, Fei Zhangfang lists the Er Qin lu by Sengrui as one of the earlier catalogues that were his sources: 釋僧叡二秦錄一卷[19](後秦) [-- SP], T2034 (XLIX) 127c3. On five other occasions, he uses the wording "Sengrui's Er Qin lu" 僧叡二秦錄 to refer to this work.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 57b17, 75c5-6, 75c19, 76a13, 77b26, 127c3

F89 is ascribed to Faju in LDSBJ, with no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67c23

菩提流支錄一卷(後魏)

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 127c11

According to Tokiwa, the Qi era Zhongjing mulu 齊世衆經目錄 is one of six catalogues that LDSBJ recorded as extant in its time. It recorded 787 titles (2334 scrolls), including apocryphal scriptures, in eight categories. Fei cited this catalogue for 27 titles ascribed to eighteen translators. Tokiwa assumes that it does not mean that those 27 cases were all recorded by Song era Zhongjing mulu 齊世衆經目錄.

Edit

45-46

Fei reports that Paramārtha translated a Shiqi di lun [thought by modern scholars to have represented part of the Yogācārabhūmi] in five juan 十七地論五卷.

Edit

T2034:49.99a4

In LDSBJ, Fei Zhangfang refers to a supposed Song QI lu 宋齊錄 by Daohui 道慧 on 18 occasions, for titles he ascribes to such figures as Buddhayaśas, Zhimeng 智猛, Tanjue 曇覺, Jijiaye 吉迦夜, and *Buddhajīva 佛馱什.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 79c2, and infra

In a list of four texts ascribed to Buddhayaśas 佛馱耶舍, Fei Zhangfang includes the Dīrghāgama T1. In an interlinear note, citing the Er Qin lu, he states that Zhu Fonian served as amanuensis, and gives a date of 413 弘始十五年 for the translation.

長阿含經二十二卷(弘始十五年出。竺佛念筆受。見二秦錄).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 79c1

Abstract:

"This study examines the biography of the monk Baoyun 寶雲 (376?-449) and lists all the titles of the translation projects in which Baoyun was involved. By comparing the information provided by different Buddhist catalogues, several discrepancies between the information on Baoyun provided by Buddhist bibliographer Sengyou 僧祐 (445-518) and by later accounts became evident. This study contextualizes the life of Baoyun in a broader historical perspective and presents the life of a monk who was a companion of Faxian 法顯 (336?-422) in his famous journey to the west, fluent in Indic languages, and a proficient translator."

Lettere argues that we can see a gradual process by which the true scope of Baoyun's activities as a translator, originally represented rather clearly by Sengyou and the sources he collects (CSZJJ), was already diminished or undermined by Huijiao (GSZ), Fei Zhangfang (LCSBJ), and Fajing; and also seems to have suffered from being overshadowed by the reputation and legends that accrued to the personality of Faxian. In the course of her treatment of biographical and other external sources on Baoyun (CSZJJ, GSZ, and documents like prefaces), Lettere notes evidence that Baoyun might have been the principal translator for the following works:

T192 (Lettere holds unequivocally that this work is "erroneously attributed to Dharmakṣema/Tan Wuchen 曇無讖", following Willemen 2009 [in error this reference is given as Chen Jinhua]: xiv-xvi);

a "new Sukhāvatī" 新無量壽 [sic, for *Amitāyus] [Lettere's citation of studies by Nogami 1950, Gotō 2006, 2007, and Nattier 2003 implies that she identifies this title with T360 -- MR];

with Zhiyan, according to Sengyou's CSZJJ, three titles: the Puyao jing 普耀經, the Guangbo yanjing jing 廣博嚴淨經, and the Si tianwang jing 四天王經 [cf. for the last two titles respectively Avaivartikacakra 廣博嚴淨經 T268, and Si tianwang jing 四天王經 T590 -- MR];

the Śrīmālādevīsiṃhanāda 勝鬘經 [T353];

the Za’ahan jing 雜阿含經 (*Saṃyuktāgama) and the Fagu jing 法鼓經 [Lettere again does not go into the problem of identification with extant texts, but cf. Saṃyuktāgama T99 and the *Mahābherīhāraka-sūtra T270 -- MR];

a Mahāparinirvāṇa in six fascicles 六卷泥洹 [cf. T7 -- MR].

[To this list we should add the Laṅkāvatāra T670; Lettere omits to list it, but cf. 後於丹陽郡譯出勝鬘楞伽經, GSZ T2059 (L) 344b3, which in fact comprises two titles, the Śrīmālādevī and the Laṅkāvatāra; cf. Lettere 265 n. 9 -- MR.]

Lettere also notes evidence that Baoyun may have composed a lost travelogue of his journeys, entitled Youlü waiguo 遊履外國.

In LDSBJ, two titles are added to Baoyun's credit; Fufa zang jing 付法藏經 [cf. T2058] and Jingdu sanwei jing 淨度三昧經 [cf. X15]; and an *Akṣayamatinirdeśa 無盡意菩薩 to the joint translatorship of Baoyun and Zhiyan [cf. T397(12)]. Lettere notes that the poor reputation of Fei as a cataloguer makes these ascriptions less plausible.

Edit

The ascription of T17 to Zhi Fadu found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites the Zhi Mindu 支敏度 and Zhu Daozu catalogues 竺道祖錄The general note for Zhi Fadu’s texts also cites Baochang. An interlinear notes states that this was the third version of the text issued, alongside texts by Dharmarakṣa and *Nandi(n) 竺難提 with alternate title(s), 尸迦羅越六向拜經. Cf. T16. Another LDSJB entry also ascribes the same title to Huijian, with no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 68a17-18, 93b11

The ascription of T22 to Tanwulan found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. At the same time, LDSBJ also lists the same title under anonymous translations of the E. Han.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55a27, 69c5

In LDSBJ, T35 is listed among anonymous texts of the Han.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55a26

The ascription of T42 (with a variant character in the title, 鐵城泥梨[v.l. 犁 P]經) to Tanwulan found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. Incongruously, the same title is also listed among anonymous E. Han texts.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55a21, 70a14

The ascription of T47 to Dharmarakṣa found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source, and gives a variant reading in the title,離[v.l. 雜 SYMP]睡經.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 64b21

The ascription of T50 to Dharmarakṣa found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 64a23

The ascription of T55 to Faju found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67c18

The ascription of T58 to Tanwulan found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 69c9

The ascription of T64 to Faju in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which gives the title as 瞻波比丘經, and cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67b16

The dating of T66 to the E. Han in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates to LDSBJ, where it is entered among a list of anonymous texts at the end of Fascicle 4, which treats works of the Han dynasty.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55a2

The ascription of T70 to Faju found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 66c20

The ascription of T79 to Guṇabhadra found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 91c13

The ascription of T83 to Dharmarakṣa found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 64a22

The ascription of T89 to Juqu Jingsheng found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 92c23

The ascription of T91 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 51b19

T93 is ascribed to Dharmarakṣa in LDSBJ, without any particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 64a22

The ascription of T113 to Faju in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The general note on Faju’s works says that none of them are given in CSZJJ, but Fei supplemented on the basis of the Jiu, bie (and other?) catalogues 僧祐錄全不載。既見舊別諸錄. The same title is anomalously listed as anonymous in Fascicle 14 of LDSBJ.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67c3, 116c12

Fei Zhangfang includes the *Ekottarikāgama in a group of five texts that he ascribes to *Dharmanandin. In an interlinear note citing the Er Qin lu and the Baochang lu, he says that the amanuenses for the translation were Huisong 慧嵩, Zhu Fonian 竺佛念, "et al." 等; and he gives a date of 384 建元二十年. In his note pertaining to the entire group of texts, he also says that when *Dharmanandin recited "the four Āgamas" (sic, the list features only two), Zhu Fonian took down the Indic text 寫為梵文.

增一阿含經五十卷(建元二十年四月一日。為秦武威太守趙文業出。是第一譯。沙門慧嵩竺佛念等筆受。見僧叡二秦錄僧祐及寶唱[+錄SYMP]並載).

....晉孝武帝世。兜佉勒國三藏法師曇摩難提。秦言法喜。以建元初至長安。誦四阿含梵本口授。竺佛念寫為梵文...

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 75c18-19, 75c24-76a2

In LDSBJ, T129 is listed among Wei-Wu anonymous texts.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 60c6

The ascription of T131 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 51b24

The ascription of T134 to Huijian in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 93b23

The ascription of T139 to Tanwulan found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites a/the bie lu 別錄, and also specifically referring to CSZJJ, saying that the title differs there, and Sengyou treats it as anonymous, 四大[v.l. 夫 P]泥梨[v.l. 犁 P]經一卷(別錄載僧祐[ -- SYMP]三藏記云失譯無大字).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 70a8

LDSBJ features one ascription this title to Juqu Jingsheng, citing CSZJJ; and another ascription to Huijian, with no particular source. This means that the ascription of T145 to Huijian in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 93a8-9, 93b22

T150A is ascribed in LDSBJ to An Shigao, with reference to the Zhu Shixing catalogue 朱士行漢錄, and Dao’an via Sengyou.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 50b1

The dating of T156 to the E. Han in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, where it is entered among a list of anonymous texts at the end of Fascicle 4, which treats works of the Han dynasty. Fei cites CSZJJ 僧祐律師出三藏記, Gu lu and Jiu lu 古舊二錄, and Dao’an, 大方便報恩經七卷.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 54b18

The ascription of T178 to Faju appears to date to LDSBJ, where it is not based on any particular source. The same title is incongruously still listed as anonymous in Fascicle 13.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67c16, 113b13

In LDSBJ, a title matching T195, 十二遊經, is the only title ascribed to 彊梁婁至 (*Kalyāṇaruci?), citing the Shixing lu and Baochang: 十二遊經一卷 右一經一卷。武帝世。外國沙門彊梁婁至。晉言真喜。太始二年[in the chronology in Fascicle 3 the date for this text is instead given as 泰康二年 = W. Jin 281 CE]於廣州譯。見始興及寶唱錄. A second notice then states that another translation with the same title was the only work produced by *Kālodaka, citing Zhu Daozu, the “miscellaneous catalogue(s?) of the Jin”, and Baochang, and stating it is only slightly different from *Kalyāṇaruci’s version: 十二遊經一卷(第二出與彊[v.l. 疆 SYM] 梁譯者小異) 右一卷。孝武帝世。外國沙門迦留陀伽。晉言時永。太元十七年譯。見竺道祖晉世雜錄及寶唱錄. A third notice then ascribes the same title to Guṇabhadra, stating that it is the second version issued (after *Kālodaka, now forgetting about the supposed *Kalyāṇaruci version?), and citing the Jiu lu: 十二遊經一卷(第二出與晉世迦留陀伽譯者小異見舊錄).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 65a8-11, 70b27-c2, 91b24

In LDSBJ, T206 is listed among anonymous Han texts, for which list (in general) Fei cites CSZJJ 僧祐律師出三藏記, Gu lu and Jiu lu 古舊二錄, and Dao’an.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 54b24

The ascription of T214 to Zhi Qian found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

At 55a19, following CSZJJ 27c1, Fei gives another note, 𤢴狗齧王經一卷(舊錄云𤢴狗經), which may referring to the same text by two alternate titles, but which could also be evidence of a variant text telling the same story (the narrative element of a dog biting its master matches T214 in content).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 58c7, cf. 55a19?

The ascription of T215 to Faju found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67a6

Fei Changfang asserts that in the translation of the 摩訶般若波羅蜜經 T223, [Yao] Xing 大秦天王姚 held the "old text"; Kumārajīva held the Indic [Sanskrit?] text 什執梵文, Zhu Fonian 竺佛念 translated 傳語, and Sengrui 僧叡 and [Seng] Zhao 肇 were amanuenses 筆受 and wrote the Preface. Fei identifies his source as Sengrui's 僧叡 Catalogue of the Two Qin [dynasties] 二秦錄.

Edit

T2034:49.77b26-27.

Fei Zhangfang says that in the translation of a text probably corresponding to the present T226, *Dharmapriya 曇摩蜱 "handled the Indic text", and Zhu Fonian 竺佛念 did the actual work of translation. He also gives a date of 382 建元十八年 for the translation. For the date, he cites the Er Qin lu, supposedly by Sengrui; it is not clear whether he wants to claim that the ascription information also derives from this (ostensible) source; it is notable that whereas the interlinear note with the date, directly citing the Er Qin lu, gives the date in terms of a Qin reign error, the following note, giving the ascription, speaks instead in terms of the E. Jin emperor Xiaowu 晉孝武帝.

摩訶鉢羅般若波羅蜜經五卷(建元十八年譯或七卷見僧叡二秦錄)
右一經五卷。晉孝武帝世。天竺三藏沙門曇摩蜱。秦言法愛。執大品梵本。竺佛念譯為秦文。亦云長安品。從所出處為名。是外國經抄

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 75c5-10

It seems likely that the received ascription of T245 to Kumārajīva was first accepted as canonical in LDSBJ, which cites a/the bie lu, and claims that the text is “only slightly different” from “that translated by Dharmarakṣa”:仁王護國般若波羅蜜經一卷(見別錄。第二出。與晉世竺法護出者文少異).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 78a23-24

The exact title of T267 is ascribed in LDSBJ to Tanyao et al. (as an alternate title for 不退轉經四卷).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 85a17

The ascription of T282 to Nie Daozhen in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 65c19

In the fifth fascicle, in the section on translators from the Wei and Wu regimes, Fei Changfang lists a Cha xulai jing 叉須賴經 in one juan among six translation texts attributed to Bai Yan 白延, which he is supposed to have produced during the reign of Gaogui Xianggong 高貴鄉公 [i.e. Cao Mao 曹髦, 241-260 CE, the grandson of Cao Pei]. The title listed includes the character 叉, but Fei adds that ‘one version/some versions? do not have the cha character,’ and here he invokes the authority of ‘Zhu Daozu, Sengyou, etc.’ According to the brief narrative appended to the list, at that time ‘The śramaṇa Bai Yan 白延 from the Western Regions, traveling and teaching, in the Ganlu 甘露 reign era (256-260), established residence at Baima Temple, where the saṃgha requested him to take up translation work” (T2034, 56c8-18).

Further in the fifth fascicle, still in the section on translators from the Wei and Wu regimes, but this time in the catalog of Zhi Qian’s works, Fei lists a Xulai jing 須賴經 in one fascicle. Fei adds that it is the second translation, after Bo/Bai Yan’s above, that its alternative title is 須賴菩薩經, and that he relies here on the authority of Zhu Daozu’s catalog and of the CSZJJ (T2034, 57b13).

In the tenth fascicle, in the catalog of translations he attributes to Guṇabhadra 求那跋陀羅, Fei places a 貧子須賴經 in one fascicle, invoking the Li Kuo catalog as his source (T2034, 92a2).

In the fourteenth fascicle, in the list of ‘Mahāyāna’ texts to be entered into the canon 大乘錄入藏目, in the subsection of texts with a known translator 有譯, Fei lists the 須賴菩薩經 in one fascicle. He says this text is the one also known as 須賴經, and that it is a retranslation 再譯. This description matches what Fei had to say about a Zhi Qian translation by the same two titles: clearly this is the text he recommends for inclusion in the zang—no mention of the alleged Guṇabhadra translation (T2034, 111b12).

In the fourteenth fascicle, in the list of ‘Mahāyāna’ sūtras to be entered into the canon 大乘錄入藏目, in the subsection of texts without a known translator 失譯, Fei lists a ‘minor’ Xulai jing小須賴經 in one fascicle (T2034, 113a8).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 56c8-18, 57b13, 92a2, 111b12, 113a8

The ascription of T332 to Faju found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The title 作佛形像, with alternate titles 優填王作佛形像經 and 作像因緣經, is also listed among Han anonymous texts. The same title as T332, with the alternate title 作佛形像經, is treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14. However, for this title, cf. also T692.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67b3, 54c2, 116c15

The ascription of T348 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 52b17

The ascription of T356 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is anomalously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 13.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 52b10-11, 113a1

Under titles sporting a range of variations, Fei Changfang ascribes a text of the same title as T371 to Dharmarakṣa; to Nie Daozhen; and to Tanwujie.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 64a3-4, 65c4, 92c12

The only place Fei mentions this title, he seems to regard it merely as an alternate title for Dharmarakṣa’s translation 等集眾德三昧經 T381. Fei refers to the catalogue of Nie Daozhen 聶道真錄:

等集眾德三昧經三卷(或云。集一切福德三昧經。或二卷。見聶道真錄)

Edit

T2034:49.62b11

The ascription of T391 to Dharmarakṣa found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 64a24, 118c11

In LDSBJ, T396 is ascribed to Zhi Qian(!), without any particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 58c12, 119a20

Records in LDSBJ relating to T427 and T430 (and possibly related texts; cf. T428, T429, T431) are complex and difficult to disentangle. The title is listed as anonymous in Fascicle 13 of LDSBJ. A closely related title ascribed to Zhi Qian, referring to the Gu lu: 八吉祥經一卷(見古錄亦有呪). A supposed second translation ascribed to Guṇabhadra, citing Sengyou and Baochang (cf. CSZJJ T2145 [LV] 12c22, 68a2-8). A very similar title, 八吉祥經, is also ascribed to *Saṅghabhara (cf. T430).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 113a5, 58b8, 91b19-20, 98b20

In LDSBK, one version of this title is listed among anonymous E. Han texts, for which Fei cites CSZJJ 僧祐律師出三藏記, Gu lu and Jiu lu 古舊二錄, and Dao'an. LDSBJ also gives the same title among a list of 120(!) texts it ascribes to Tanwulan, citing CSZJJ. It then lists the same title a third time in a list of 53 anonymous texts of the E. Jin.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 54c6, 69b10, 74b4

The ascription of T463 to Nie Daozhen in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source . However, the same title is anomalously listed as anonymous in Fascicle 13.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 65c7, 112c21

The dating of T491 to the E. Han in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates to LDSBJ, where it is entered among a list of anonymous texts at the end of Fascicle 4, which treats works of the Han dynasty.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 54c19

The ascription of T497 to Guṇabhadra in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no specific source. In Fascicle 14, however, LDSBJ anomalously lists the same title as anonymous.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 91c26, 117a26

The ascription of T500 to Faju found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 66c22, 116c25

The ascription of T502 to Faju in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67b24, 117a4

The ascription of T506 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source, and gives the title as 健陀國王經, but also notes 或無國字. The same text is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14, with the title given as 揵[v.l. 犍 M]陀國王經.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 52b5, 117b12

The ascription of T509 to Faju found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 13.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67a23, 113b18

T512 is ascribed to Faju in LDSBJ, with no particular source. Under the title 淨飯王般涅槃經, a matching text is also ascribed to Juqu Jingsheng, with a note that it is the second translation, and again with no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 67a22, 92c22

The ascription of T525 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 50c13, 117b19

T527 is ascribed to Zhi Fadu in LDSBJ, with no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 68a15-16

The ascription of T537 to Nie Chengyuan found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The general note about Nie Chengyuan’s translations (only three in total) also mentions no sources. Elsewhere, LDSBJ also ascribes the variant title 曰難經 to Shi Songgong/Gaoggong 釋嵩公/高公, with no particular source for this one text, but a general note covering three texts citing the Zhao lu 趙錄 and Shixing lu 始興錄. LDSBJ then features a third note ascribing the same title (giving both variant readings) to Guṇabhadra, with no particular source. The same title is then incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 65b21, 72a13, 91c12, 117b20

A title corresponding to T1301 ascribed in LDSBJ (as the "first issue") to An Shigao (cf. T551), citing the Jiu lu, 舍頭諫經一卷(初出。見舊錄亦云舍頭諫太子明二十八宿經。亦云太子明星二十八宿經。亦云虎耳經). Another entry also ascribes a related title, 摩鄧女經, to An Shigao, with no particular source. The same title(s) is/are also ascribed in LDSBJ to Dharmarakṣa, citing Dao’an 舍頭諫經一卷(亦云大子二十八宿經。亦云虎耳意經。與摩登伽經同本異出。第二譯。與漢世安世高所出者小異。見釋道安錄).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 51a6-7, 52a6, 63c16-17

In LDSBJ, T566 is listed in the anonymous E. Han catalogue in LDSBJ, for which Fei cites CSZJJ 僧祐律師出三藏記, Gu lu and Jiu lu 古舊二錄, and Dao'an. The same title is also given for an ascription to Fahai, where it is related to a title ascribed to Dharmarakṣa.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55b11, 94a14-15

The ascription of T611 to Dharmarakṣa found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 64a21, 119a6

LDSBJ treats T618 as anonymous in Fascicle 14. The text is also listed among Han anonymous texts, with the title 瑜伽三磨斯經一卷 equivated to other titles (LDSBJ here just repeats a CSZJJ interlinear note: 譯言修行略。一名達磨多羅禪法。或云達磨多羅菩薩]撰。禪法要集). However, in Fascicle 14, this alternate title is anomalously listed as a text with a known translator.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 117c24, 55b19-20, 115c27

One title clearly related to T622 and T623 is ascribed to An Shigao in LDSBJ, with no particular source. The present attribution of T622 to An Shigao probably derives from this record. Another text with a similar title is ascribed to Dharmarakṣa in LDSBJ, with no particular source; cf. T623, and ascriptions of similar titles to Dharmarakṣa in CSZJJ and Fajing. However, the title 如來獨證自誓三昧經 (which is closer to T623) is also ascribed to *Gītamitra in LDSBJ, with an anomalous note saying it is the second translation (rather than the third): 第二出).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 51b5, 63b11, 71c11

The ascription of T684 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source: 父母恩勤[v.l. 難 M]報經一卷(一云難報出中阿含).

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 51a13

The dating of T688 to the E. Han found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates to LDSBJ, where it is entered among a list of anonymous texts at the end of Fascicle 4, which treats works of the Han dynasty. The same title is also given in LDSBJ as an alternate title for the 未曾有因緣經, which is included in a list of 53 anonymous texts of the E. Jin. The title 未曾有經 is also treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14. The title 未曾有因緣經 is incongruously treated as a text that DOES have an ascription, in Fascicle 13; but this probably refers to the ascription to Tanjing, citing the Shixing lu, 96a25. The title 未曾有因緣經 is still borne by T754, which carries an ascription to Tanjing in the Taishō.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55a28, 74a27, 110b11, 117c1

In LDSBJ, T696 is listed in the anonymous E. Han catalogue, for which Fei cites CSZJJ 僧祐律師出三藏記, Gu lu and Jiu lu 古舊二錄, and Dao'an. However, another notice in LDSBJ ascribes the 灌佛經 (which is treated elsewhere, e.g. in CSZJJ and Fajing, as an alternate title) to Shengjian/Fajian, citing the Shixing lu. Thus, the ascription of T696 in the present canon to Shengjian probably derives from this LDSBJ notice. In Fascicle 14 of LDSBJ, both titles are treated as anonymous, making the ascription to Shengjian/Fajian an anomaly.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55b5, 83c9, 116c23-24

The ascription of 729 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. Anomalously, the 十善十惡經, which is treated as an alternate title of T729, is treated elsewhere (e.g. in Fajing) as anonymous in Fascicle 14 of LDSBJ, with yet another variation on the title:亦云[ +分別 SYMP]貧富善惡所起經.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 51a23, 117c9

The ascription of T731 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source: 十八地獄經一卷(或云十八泥犁). The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 51c16, 118c23

The ascription of T733 to An Shigao found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 52a2, 117b13

The ascription of T738 to Dharmarakṣa found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 64a28

The ascription of T743 to Tanwulan found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites Jiu lu for variations in the title.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 70a6

The ascription of T753 to Guṇabhadra found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruosly treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 91c4, 117b8

In LDSBJ, T760 is listed among anonymous Han texts.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55b4

The ascription of T769 to Dharmarakṣa found in the present canon (the Taishō) may ultimately derive from LDSBJ. LDSBJ lists this text among Wei-Wu anonymous texts, with various titles: 四輩經一卷(舊錄云四事弟子經。或云四輩學經). However, it also lists the title of the present T769 as an alternate title of the 灌臘經, ascribed to Dharmarakṣa. However, the 灌臘 is also extant as T391, and so if this record is the basis for the ascription of T769 to Dharmarakṣa, two texts have been assigned this ascription on the basis of the same LDSBJ entry.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 61a12, 64a24

The ascription of T777 to Bo Fazu in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. In the general note following the Bo Fazu list, Fei only says that he investigated a wide range of “assorted records and catalogues” 諸雜記錄 to make up for the supposed shortcomings of Sengyou. Incongruously, the same title is also given among the texts in the E. Jin anonymous list, without any specific source, and without any comment in either location to account for the difference between the two listings. The same title is treated as anonymous in Fascicle 13.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 66b14, 74b11, 113a11

The ascription of T791 to An Shigao in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 51a8, 116c28

The ascription of T797 to Huijian found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 93b14, 117b18

The ascription of T816 to An Faqin in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites the Zhu Daozu 竺道祖 catalogue and the “miscellaneous catalogue(s?) of the Jin era”晉世雜錄. The same title is also given as an alternate title of the 合道神足經四卷(一名道神足無極變化經), which is listed among anonymous Han texts.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 65a13-20, 53b22

The ascription of T826 to Juqu Jingsheng in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. Fei’s general note on Juqu Jingsheng’s translations only mentions GSZ as a specific source, and then not in a way that claims it to be the source of his ascriptions. The same title is incongruously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 14.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 93a3, 117c19

Fei Changfang's LDSBJ is the primary source for the account of the origins of the Zhancha jing 占察經 T839. Allegedly, there was a monk in the Guangzhou region who engaged in a practice called “stūpa contrition” 塔懺法, which entailed divination for the prognosis of karma, and expurgation of bad karma by self-flagellation. The activities of his group were reported to the Guangzhou officials under the charge of 妖 [pernicious magical practices? witchcraft? spirit possession?]. An investigation was conducted, and the group claimed in their own defense that their practice was based upon the Zhancha jing. Saṃgha authorities found that the catalogues contained record of the translator or place of translation, and declared that the practice was in violation of scriptural authority.
占察經二卷
右一部二卷。檢群錄無目。而經首題云。菩提登在外國譯。似近代出妄注。今諸藏內並寫流傳。而廣州有一僧行塔懺法。以皮作二枚帖子。一書善字一書惡字。令人擲之。得善者好。得惡者不好。又行自撲法以為滅罪。而男女合雜。青州亦有一居士。同行此法。開皇十三年。有人告廣州官司云。其是妖。官司推問。其人引證云。塔懺法[20]依占察經。自撲法依諸經中五體投地如太山崩。廣州司馬郭誼來京向岐州具狀奏聞。勅不信占察經道理。令內史侍郎李元操共郭誼就寶昌寺問諸大德法經等。報云。占察經目錄無名及譯處。塔懺法與眾經復異。不可依行。勅云。諸如此者不須流行.

Edit

T2034:49.106c8-22.

The ascription of T1013 to Guṇabhadra found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 92a8

T1161 is ascribed in LDSBJ to *Kālayaśas, citing Dahui’s Song-Qi catalogue 道慧宋齊錄 and GSZ.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 92c3

A title corresponding to T1327 is listed among anonymous E. Han texts in LDSBJ. However, "the same" title (or another text under the same title?) is also ascribed to Tanwulan elsewhere in LDSBJ, with no particular source, under the title 呪齒痛經. This would appear to be the ultimate source of the present-day ascription of T1327 to Tanwulan. However, both these titles are also listed agaij as anonymous in LDSBJ Fascicle 13, which is difficult to reconcile with the ascription to Tanwulan.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 55c5, 70b11, 114b3-4

T1342 is ascribed to Shengjian/Fajian in LDSBJ, under the variant title 無涯~, with a reference to the Shixing lu. The same title is also ascribed to Guṇabhadra et al.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 83c1, 92a5

A title exactly matching T1356 is treated as anonymous in LDSBJ. However, a very slightly variant title, 華積陀羅尼呪經, is also ascribed to Zhi Qian, citing Baochang. This notice is probably the ultimate origin of the ascription attached to T1356 in the Taishō.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 113c28, 58b7

The ascription of T1391 to Tanwulan found in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which gives the variant檀持~ in the title, and no particular source; a neighbouring, very similar title, 麻油述呪經, is also ascribed to Tanwulan. Both of these titles are anomalously treated as anonymous in Fascicle 13, again right next to one another.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 70b3-4, 114a22-23

In LDSBJ, titles corresponding to T1406 are ascribed to An Shigao (呪賊經一卷); listed among anonymous Han texts (呪賊呪法一卷), with the claim that it is an alternate version 異本,; and listed as anonymous in Fascicle 13.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 52a18, 55c7, 114b8

A title corresponding to T1466 is listed in LDSBJ among anonymous E. Han texts (for which Fei cites CSZJJ 僧祐律師出三藏記, Gu lu and Jiu lu 古舊二錄, and Dao'an). The same title is also included in a list of 53 anonymous texts of the E. Jin.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 54c24, 74b9

This title is treated as anonymous in LDSBJ. A supposed second translation also listed as anonymous. The present ascription of T1470 to An Shigao may date back to the LDSBJ entry for the 大僧威儀經四卷, which is included among An Shigao’s texts, and have an interlinear note reading: 右二經。並見別錄。新附別有異出。本小不同。祐失譯分為兩部二卷。即此別錄合者是.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 119c3, 119c12, 50a23-24

The dating of T1474 to the E. Han in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates to LDSBJ, where it is entered among a list of anonymous texts at the end of Fascicle 4, which treats works of the Han dynasty. The same title is also included in a list of 53 anonymous texts of the E. Jin.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 54c27, 74b11

In LDSBJ, this exact title (T1485) is ascribed to Zhiyan and Baoyun, with no source. The title 瓔珞本業經 is ascribed to Zhu Fonian, again without any particular source cited.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 89c3, 77a21

In LDSBJ, a title corresponding to T1490 is listed in the anonymous E. Han catalogue, for which Fei cites CSZJJ 僧祐律師出三藏記, Gu lu and Jiu lu 古舊二錄, and Dao'an. A second notice ascribes the text to Fahai, saying that it is an alternate version of a text translated by Dharmarakṣa: 寂調音所問經一卷(一名如來所說清淨調伏經與晉世竺法護文殊行律同本異出). The title is also listed among anonymous texts in Fascicle 13.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 54c12, 94a16-17, 114b22

The dating of T1507 to the E. Han in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates to LDSBJ, where it is entered among a list of anonymous texts at the end of Fascicle 4, which treats works of the Han dynasty. Fei cites CSZJJ 僧祐律師出三藏記, Gu lu and Jiu lu 古舊二錄, and Dao’an: 分別功德經五卷(迦葉阿難撰) .

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 54b19

In LDSBJ, T1553 is listed as an anonymous text of the Wei-Wu. This is probably the ultimate source of the dating to the Cao Wei that still appears in the byline of T1553 in the Taishō.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 60b18

In LDSBJ, a title corresponding to T1670 is treated as a anonymous text of the E. Jin, citing CSZJJ; but also to Guṇabhadra, Baoyun et al., citing “various catalogues”.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 74a28, 91c11

The ascription of T2027 to An Shigao in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source. LDSBJ also contains a record of a supposed second translation by Yan Fotiao 嚴佛調, citing the Cen Hao 岑號 and Boachang catalogues.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 52b16, 54a20-21

The ascription of T310(33) to Nie Daozhen in the present canon (the Taishō) probably dates back to LDSBJ, which cites no particular source.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 66a2

In LDSBJ, a title corresponding to X15 (Jingdu sanmei jing) is ascribed once to Tanyao, with no source; again to Tanyao, citing Daozu’s catalogue 道祖錄; a supposed alternate version is also ascribed to Zhiyan and Baoyun, citing Zhu Daozu (and the?) miscellaneous catalogue 竺道祖雜錄; and (probably referring again to the same latter version) to Guṇabhadra, Baoyun et al., citing Li Kuo 李廓錄.

Edit

T2034 (XLIX) 43a1, 85a24, 89c9, 89c18, 91b8

LDSBJ says that after his arrival in Chang'an in 265, Dharmarakṣa translated a first, shorter version of the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka by this title.薩芸分陀利經六卷(太始元年譯。見竺道祖晉世雜錄).

Edit

T2034:49.62a15